MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012786114 · doi:10.1109/mascots.2012.48

Barrier Counting in Mixed Wireless Sensor Networks

2012· article· en· W2012786114 on OpenAlexaff
Shambhavi Srinivasa, Carey Williamson, Zongpeng Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkInteger programmingComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionLinear programmingComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barrier coverage problems in sensor networks involve detecting intruders that attempt to cross a region of interest. In this paper, we formulate the k-connect barrier count problem for Mixed Sensor Networks (MSNs). The k-connect barrier count problem is to find the maximum number of barriers in an arbitrary MSN where at most k distinct mobile sensors can be used to construct any given virtual edge used in a barrier. We present the solution for the k-connect barrier count problem for k ∈ {0, 1, 2} via Integer Linear Programming. Using simulation results, we show that as k increases, the density of sensors required to achieve barrier coverage decreases. The results quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of mobile sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207