MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012788216 · doi:10.1037//1064-1297.10.4.339

The consequences of different "lapses" on relapse to heroin seeking in rats.

2002· article· en· W2012788216 on OpenAlex
Francesco Leri, Jane Stewart

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeroinAbstinenceExtinction (optical mineralogy)Stimulus (psychology)PsychologySelf-administrationHeroin addictionMedicinePsychiatryClinical psychologyDrugAnesthesiaPsychotherapistBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although human studies have shown that a lapse, the first violation of abstinence, often induces resumption of drug taking, or relapse, it is not known what aspect of a lapse is critical to relapse or whether this phenomenon can be studied in other species. Rats were trained to self-administer heroin accompanied by a discrete light stimulus. After extinction, different groups experienced different "lapses." Twenty-four hours later, all groups received a test for relapse. It was found that a lapse during which heroin was self-administered, or was presented in close temporal contiguity with lever pressing, induced subsequent heroin seeking. Simple exposure to heroin, or to heroin-related stimuli, during the lapse had little effect on responding in the test for relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it