L'émergence et l'évolution des études et science régionales au Québec (1908-2008) Des liens et des lieux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte analyse l’émergence et l’évolution, entre 1908 et 2008, des études et science régionales et du développement régional et territorial francophones au Québec (Canada). Six configurations ont été identifiées. L’analyse spectrale proposée met en évidence des continuités, des changements, des débats et des tensions. Un champ scientifique a progressivement émergé et peut être caractérisé par un ensemble d’informations reliées à propos de problèmes considérés importants durant toute la période : les variations de la distribution des populations et des ressources et la question des liens entre les populations et les systèmes écologiques, sociaux et économiques. En revisitant des publications issues de groupes de chercheurs rattachés à des communautés linguistiques et sociales, les groupes de chercheurs et praticiens peuvent envisager de nouvelles pistes pour poser et résoudre des problèmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".