MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012804356 · doi:10.1021/ja0443225

One-Step Synthesis of Core(Cr)/Shell(γ-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) Nanoparticles

2005· article· en· W2012804356 on OpenAlexaff
Jriuan Lai, Kurikka V. P. M. Shafi, Abraham Ulman, Katja Loos, Ronit Popovitz‐Biro, Yongjae Lee, Thomas Vogt, Claude Estournès

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicIron oxide chemistry and applications
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
FundersAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungMaterials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChemistrySuperparamagnetismStoichiometryNanoparticleMössbauer spectroscopyMetalShell (structure)SynchrotronCrystal structureCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Mixing (physics)NanotechnologyPhysical chemistryMagnetizationMaterials scienceMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core(Cr)/shell(gamma-Fe(2)O(3)) nanoparticles were synthesized by mixing Fe(CO)(5) and Cr(CO)(6) in the 9:1 ratio. These particles exhibit narrow size distribution with 13.5 nm as mean diameter and uniform spherical shape. The TEM image, which is in good agreement with the synchrotron powder XRD pattern, reveals the heterogeneous nature (core/shell structure). The analysis of the pattern reveals gamma-Fe(2)O(3) structure and a metal crystal structure. Mossbauer spectra, which support the superparamagnetic behavior determined by H-M measurement, do not show any traceable amount of Fe(0). This suggests that the metal component is Cr. EELS analysis and iron mapping suggest controlled stoichiometry and also confirm a core made of Cr and a shell made of gamma-Fe(2)O(3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicIron oxide chemistry and applicationsFrench-language works237,207