A new genus and three new species of parasitoid wasp from Papua New Guinea and redescription of<i>Trigonophatnus</i>Cameron (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vojtechirogas novotnyi gen. nov. & sp. nov., V. heberti sp. nov. and V. wantok sp. nov. reared from Philiris helena (Snellen) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) feeding on Macaranga spp., in northern lowland Papua New Guinea, are described and illustrated. Based on molecular data, on the modified vein 2-SC+R of the hind wing and the inclivous vein r-m of the forewing, Vojtechirogas gen. nov. appears most closely related to the monotypic genus Trigonophatnus Cameron, 1907 Cameron, P. 1907. Hymenoptera of the Dutch expedition to New Guinea in 1904 an 1905. Part II: Parasitic Hymenoptera. Tijdschr Ent, 50: 27–57. [Google Scholar], also from Papua New Guinea. These two genera differ from one another markedly in many characters usually considered important in Rogadinae systematics such as the presence/absence of a subbasal lobe of the claws, of the mediolongitudinal carina of the metanotum and of the basal triangular area of the second metasomal tergite. Trigonophatnus is redescribed and illustrated and is reported as a parasitoid of Hypochrysops chrysargyrus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) based upon molecular analysis of host remains. Additional specimens of Vojtechirogas gen. nov. are reported but not assigned to species because of lack of molecular data in this morphologically uniform genus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".