MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012811608 · doi:10.1115/1.1511738

Thoughts on inquiries in physical and inner worlds

2003· article· en· W2012811608 on OpenAlexafffundabout
V. MODI

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics Reviews · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsColumbia universityHistoryComputer scienceSociologyMedia studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retrospectives Thoughts on inquiries in physical and inner worlds VJ Modi VJ Modi Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4; modi@mech.vbc.ca Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Author and Article Information VJ Modi Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4; modi@mech.vbc.ca Appl. Mech. Rev. Mar 2003, 56(2): R9-R18 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1511738 Published Online: March 4, 2003 Article history Online: March 4, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.032
Scholarly communication0.0110.018
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics ReviewsSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207