MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012825291 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810973

The sub-Jupiter mass transiting exoplanet WASP-11b

2009· article· en· W2012825291 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. G. West, A. Collier Cameron, Leslie Hebb, Y. C. Joshi, D. Pollacco, E. K. Simpson, I. Skillen, H. C. Stempels, P. J. Wheatley, David M. Wilson, D. R. Anderson, S. J. Bentley, F. Bouchy, D. J. Christian, B. Enoch, Neale P. Gibson, G. Hébrard, C. Hellier, B. Loeillet, M. Mayor, P. F. L. Maxted, Iain McDonald, C. Moutou, F. Pont, D. Queloz, A. M. S. Smith, B. Smalley, R. A. Street, S. Udry

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionQueen's UniversityInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasLiverpool John Moores UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsExoplanetPhysicsAstrophysicsPhotometry (optics)PlanetAstronomyHot JupiterRadial velocityGas giantJupiter (rocket family)Orbital periodPlanetary systemStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the discovery of a sub-Jupiter mass exoplanet transiting a magnitude host star 1SWASP J030928.54+304024.7. A simultaneous fit to the transit photometry and radial-velocity measurements yield a planet mass Mp = 0.53 ± 0.07 , radius and an orbital period of days. The host star is an early to mid-K dwarf, with a spectral analysis yielding an effective temperature of 4800 ± 100 K and log g = 4.45 ± 0.2. It is amongst the smallest, least massive and lowest luminosity stars known to harbour a transiting exoplanet. WASP-11b is the third least strongly irradiated transiting exoplanet discovered to date, experiencing an incident flux Fp = 1.9108 erg s-1 cm-2 and having an equilibrium temperature Teql = 960 ± 70 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207