MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012857296 · doi:10.1109/sarnof.2007.4567394

On performance bounds for joint parameter estimation and modulation classification

2007· article· en· W2012857296 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-shift keyingQuadrature amplitude modulationAmplitude and phase-shift keyingCramér–Rao boundKeyingModulation (music)Estimation theoryUpper and lower boundsJoint (building)AlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)MathematicsAmplitudeComputer scienceBinary numberStatisticsTelecommunicationsBit error ratePhysicsDecoding methodsEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate bounds on performance of joint parameter estimation and modulation classification. The Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs) of non-data aided joint estimates of signal amplitude and phase, and noise power are derived for binary phase shift keying (BPSK) and quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) signals. In addition, an upper bound on performance of Quasi Hybrid Likelihood Ratio Test (QHLRT)-based modulation classifiers is proposed, for the case when unbiased and normally-distributed non-data aided estimates of unknown parameters are available. Results for this upper bound are presented for BPSK and QPSK classification, with signal amplitude and phase, and noise power as unknown parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it