MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012865441 · doi:10.1139/e09-001

A new parareptile with temporal fenestration from the Middle Permian of South Africa

2009· article· en· W2012865441 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sean P. Modesto, Diane Scott, Robert R. Reisz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsAmgen (Canada)Cape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaurasiaGondwanaPaleontologyPermianSynapomorphySister groupGeologyAutapomorphyPectoral girdleBiologyPhylogenetic treeAnatomyStructural basinClade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The partial skeleton of a small reptile, from the Middle Permian Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone of South Africa, is described as a new parareptile. Australothyris smithi gen. et sp. nov. is diagnosed by contact between the postfrontal and the supratemporal, a relatively large pineal foramen, a small interpterygoid vacuity, the presence of teeth on the ventral surfaces of the basipterygoid processes, and several other autapomorphies. Phylogenetic analysis of an augmented data matrix from the literature positions A. smithi basally within Parareptilia, as the sister taxon of Ankyramorpha. Our results indicate that the presence of a lateral temporal fenestra is synapomorphic for procolophonomorphs (as regarded in this paper) and that this structure was variously modified in procolophonians. Australothyris smithi is the phylogenetically youngest member of a grade of Gondwanan parareptiles that includes mesosaurids and millerosaurs, a topology intimating that parareptiles diversified first in Gondwana and then dispersed into Laurasia. This biogeographic scenario is at odds with observations that the bolosaurids of Laurasia predate mesosaurids and other Gondwanan parareptiles by approximately 15 million years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207