MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012881961 · doi:10.1159/000180676

An Unusual Cause of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Left-to-Right Shunt due to Atrial Septal Defect

2008· article· en· W2012881961 on OpenAlex
Pierre Vladimir Ennezat, Françis Juthier, André Vincentelli, Philippe Pîbarot, Sylvestre Maréchaux

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineShunt (medical)StenosisEjection fractionHeart failureRight-to-left shuntSeptum secundumRegurgitation (circulation)Stroke volumeMitral regurgitationPatent foramen ovale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS) may occur despite preserved left-ventricular (LV) ejection fraction in older females with marked LV concentric remodeling and small LV cavity size or in patients with coexisting severe mitral regurgitation. This report illustrates the case of a paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe AVS despite preserved LV function related to an ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) in a patient presenting with congestive heart failure. Left-to-right shunt ASD that lowers forward LV stroke volume translating into lower transvalvular gradients is an underrecognized cause of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe AVS. In addition, if not detected before open-heart surgery, ASD may result in cardiopulmonary bypass life-threatening complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it