MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CONTROLLER FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF TIDAL LIQUID VENTILATORS WITH AN INDEPENDENT PUMP SYSTEM

2006· article· en· W2012897904 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Robert, Hervé Walti, Jean‐Paul Praud, Philippe Micheau

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)Controller (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Tidal volumeVentilation (architecture)Constant (computer programming)ExpirationAirwaySimulationComputer scienceAnesthesiaEngineeringMedicineRespiratory systemMechanical engineeringControl (management)PhysicsThermodynamicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to insert and withdraw the tidal volume of perfluorochemical liquid (PFC), the total liquid ventilation (TLV) can be efficiently performed with a pump system. The main originality of the developed prototype is that the expiratory pump is independent of the inspiratory one. Consequently, they are controlled independently. The main advantages are to allow the adjustment of the functional residual capacity (FRC) during ventilations and the optimization of the ventilation cycle. However, two main points must be considered in volume-controlled TLV: avoiding airway closure (chocked flow) during expiration and controlling the FRC volume in the lungs. For this purpose, a controller is implemented to manage the pumping system. The main function of the controller is to control with high precision the volume of liquid to insert and withdraw in the lungs. Due to uncertainties, the pump system generates small volume errors at each inspiratory and expiratory cycle. Over time, the addition of small volume errors may cause an FRC drift. To avoid this problem, the controller monitors the movement of the pumps in order to compute small corrections of the desired inspiratory and expiratory volumes. Consequently, cycle after cycle, the controller learns the command which ensures a constant FRC. In order to withdraw the tidal volume, the controller generates an exponential expiratory profile defined by a time constant. The implementation of this profile is motivated by the need to prevent the risk of airway closure. Moreover, the exponential expiratory profile reproduces the effect of gravity by which the tidal volume of PFC is withdrawn from the lungs. However, even if an exponential is used, airway closures can still appear (if the FRC is too low or the flow velocity is too high). The risk of airway closure during expiration is detected when a negative pressure limit is reached. In this case, the controller stops the expiratory pump, but adjusts the next inspiratory volume in order to ensure a constant FRC in the lungs. Experimental results in vivo and in vitro with newborn lambs confirmed the benefit of using the controller with the exponential expiratory profile. The team is supported in part by the Foundation for Research into Children's Diseases and by the Fonds Québécois pour la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASAIO JournalSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207