MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Regulation of Allergy with RNA Interference

2009· review· en· W2012914309 on OpenAlexaff
Motohiko Suzuki, Xiufen Zheng, Xusheng Zhang, Yuwei Zhang, Thomas E. Ichim, Wei‐Ping Min

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Immunology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA interferenceSmall interfering RNAAllergyMedicineAtopic dermatitisImmunologyAllergic responseAllergic asthmaAllergic inflammationRNAGeneBiologyImmunoglobulin EGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and atopic dermatitis are clinically challenging. Although current treatments such as antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids are effective at reducing symptoms, they do not address the underlying cause of the allergic response. Therefore, novel therapies that target upstream causative events in allergic diseases are desirable. The induction of RNA interference (RNAi) by small interfering RNA (siRNA) is a potent method for specifically knocking down molecular targets. Gene modulation by siRNA is therapeutically promising, with clinical safety and feasibility already demonstrated. However, to our knowledge, the use of siRNA in the area of allergic disease has been limited. Recently, we demonstrated the inhibition of CD40 by siRNA as a means of inhibiting allergic reactions. RNAi-based therapies represent a novel and promising strategy for the control of both the symptoms of allergy and the cause of the allergic response. Here we discuss the potential of siRNA in the treatment of allergic diseases by focusing on molecular and cellular interactions involved in the allergic cascade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in ImmunologySame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207