Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: Effects of implant design and implantation time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detailed characterization of wear particles is necessary to understand better the implant wear mechanisms and the periprosthetic tissue response. The purposes of the present study were to compare particle characteristics of current with older designs of metal-on-metal (MM) total hip replacements (THRs), and to determine the effect of implantation time on wear particle characteristics. Metal wear particles isolated from periprosthetic tissues from 19 patients with MM THRs of current and older designs and at different implantation times (very short, longer, and very long) were studied using transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. The particles from the current design implants with implantation times of not more than 15 months (very short-term) were almost exclusively round to oval chromium oxide particles. In all other cases, although the predominance was still round to oval chromium oxide particles, greater proportions of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) particles, mainly needle-shaped, were detected. Very long-term THRs implanted for more than 20 years had the highest percentage of needle-shaped Co-Cr-Mo particles. Particle lengths were not markedly different between the different designs and implantation times except for the current design implants of not more than 15 months, which had a significantly smaller mean length of 39 nm. In conclusion, the implant design did not seem to have a significant influence on particle characteristics whereas the implantation time appeared to have the most effect on the particles. It should be noted that, because of the limited number of tissue retrievals available, some uncertainty remains regarding the generality of these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".