Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uranium and thorium series radionuclides are present in all soils and rocks. Thus, radon and thoron, the radioactive noble gases originating in the uranium ((238)U) and thorium ((232)Th) decay chains is ubiquitous and everyone is exposed to both radon and thoron gases and their particulate radioactive decay products. As described in UNSCEAR Annex E (2006), radon and its decay products have been recognised for many years as a hazard to underground miners. More recently, the risks from exposure to residential radon have been demonstrated through residential case-control epidemiological studies. However, as discussed by UNSCEAR, exposures to thoron and its decay products have often been relatively ignored. Moreover, unlike radon the effects of exposure to thoron and its decay products are not available from epidemiology and thus, a dosimetric approach is required to assess risks. UNSCEAR continues to recommend the use of a dose conversion factor for thoron decay products of 40 nSv (Bq h m(-3))(-1). UNSCEAR Annex E suggests there is an emerging problem, namely, that the contribution of (220)Rn (thoron) gas to the (222)Rn (radon) gas measurement signal is not well known. Until recently, this has largely been ignored. This is an important consideration as measurements at work and homes are the basis for investigating lung cancer exposure-response relationships. Based on UNSCEAR Annex E, this paper provides an overview of the sources and levels of thoron and its associated decay products at home and work. In addition, this paper provides an overview of the thoron dosimetry considered by UNSCEAR Annex E and some recent results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it