MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012960609 · doi:10.1109/icmla.2014.25

Semi-supervised Kernel-Based Temporal Clustering

2014· article· en· W2012960609 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSpectral clusteringKernel (algebra)Pattern recognition (psychology)Correlation clusteringConstrained clusteringCanopy clustering algorithmData miningCURE data clustering algorithmFuzzy clusteringMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we adapt two existing methods to perform semi-supervised temporal clustering: Aligned Cluster Analysis (ACA), a temporal clustering algorithm, and Constrained Spectral Clustering, a semi-supervised clustering algorithm. In the first method, we add side information in the form of pair wise constraints to its objective function, and in the second, we add a temporal search to its framework. We also extend both methods by propagating the constraints throughout the whole similarity matrix. In order to validate the advantage of the proposed semi-supervised methods to temporal clustering, we evaluate them in comparison to their original versions as well as another semi-supervised temporal cluster on three temporal datasets. The results show that the proposed methods are competitive and provide good improvement over the unsupervised approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207