MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimento de produção sobre a prosódia da não exaustividade no português brasileiro

2013· article· pt· W201297417 on OpenAlexaff
Daise Ribeiro Pereira Carpes, Juan Manuel Sosa, Izabel Christine Seara

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Leitura · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the initial findings of a study on non-exhaustivity in Brazilian Portuguese. We aim to verify if and how prosody, more specifically,intonation, can direct the interpretation by listeners exposed to utterances with non-exhaustive focus, comparing their intonational contours with those of utterances with exhaustive and contrastive focus. The first results show that non-exhaustive focus can be expressed prosodically by means of specific intonational contours, but also that the pitch curves with either exhaustive or contrastive focus seem to have a very similar intonational shape; for this reason the latter would need lexical markers like 'only' and 'not'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista LeituraSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207