MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012974842 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201401480

Identifying Gas Channel Sweet Spots through Multi-Component Seismic Interpretation

2007· article· en· W2012974842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murray Roth

Bibliographic record

Venue69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Channel (broadcasting)Component (thermodynamics)CretaceousPorosityDrillingFluvialNatural gas fieldPetrologyPetroleum engineeringStructural basinPaleontologyNatural gasGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B024 Identifying Gas Channel Sweet Spots through Multi-Component Seismic Interpretation M.W. Roth* (Transform Software & Services Inc.) SUMMARY Lower Cretaceous fluvial sands offer tantalizing yet challenging gas plays in the Rocky Mountain basins of Canada and the United States. Reservoirs range from single sand channels often with high porosity and permeability to stacked sequences of channels hundreds or even thousands of feet thick generally of low porosity and permeability. Across this spectrum of reservoir types the similar objective is to identify drilling “sweet spots” using available seismic and other E&P data. In this case study the effectiveness of multi-component seismic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207