Arthritis onset and worsening self-rated health: A longitudinal evaluation of the role of pain and activity limitations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To longitudinally explore the hypothesized role of worsening pain and development of activity limitations as mediators in the relationship between arthritis onset and worsening self-rated health (SRH). METHODS: Data was obtained from the 1998/1999 and 2000/2001 cycles of the population-based Canadian longitudinal National Population Health Survey (n = 10,859; ages > or = 18; response rate: time 1 = 81.6%, time 2 = 89.2%). Respondents were asked about chronic conditions, pain, activity limitations, and self-perceived health; change over time was assessed. Change in effect of arthritis onset on worsening SRH upon considering potential mediators was assessed through multivariate logistic regression, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and onset of other conditions. RESULTS: Worsening pain fully explained the effect of arthritis onset on worsening SRH; a portion of the effect of worsening pain was mediated by the development of activity limitation. Residual direct effect of arthritis onset was statistically insignificant. Worsening pain and development of activity limitations also mediated a portion of the effects of onset of other chronic conditions but to a lesser extent than arthritis onset. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine these relationships longitudinally. Identifying the role of mediators is necessary if target areas of prevention and/or management are sought, either at the individual or population level. Our results indicate that the development of arthritis has a significant impact on worsening SRH. Pain and development of activity limitations fully account for the relationship between arthritis onset and worsening SRH. High priority should be placed on prevention and management strategies for pain among people with arthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".