MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2013033625 · doi:10.4141/p01-062

Expression of resistance to stripe rust, powdery mildew and the wheat curl mite in <i>Triticum aestivum</i> × <i>Haynaldia villosalines</i>

2002· article· en· W2013033625 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Q. Chen, R. L. Conner, Huayang Li, André Laroche, R. J. Graf, A. D. Kuzyk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsPowdery mildewChromosomal translocationBiologyCommon wheatRust (programming language)VillosaChromosomeGeneticsGeneBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stripe rust, powdery mildew and the wheat curl mite (Aceria tosichella) (WCM) are common problems in wheat throughout the world. The expression of resistance to these diseases and the mite was investigated in wheat ×Haynaldia villosa chromosome addition, substitution and translocation lines. Progeny tests and cytogenetic examinations were carried out on crosses of the 6VS translocation line with susceptible genotypes of wheat to study the inheritance of the stripe rust, powdery mildew and WCM resistance. These studies also were used to elucidate if the resistance was associated with the H. villosa 6V chromosome. The test results confirmed the presence of a high level of resistance to stripe rust in wheat × H. villosa 6V addition and 6VS translocation lines. However, progeny tests and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analysis showed that the stripe rust resistance gene, Yr26 was not associated with the H. villosa chromosome arm 6VS. While WCM and powdery mildew resistance were always associated with the presence of the 6VS chromosome arm in the F2 and F3 populations. The study also showed that most wheat × H. villosa addition or substitution lines were heterogenous in their reaction to stripe rust. The possible reasons for the heterogeneous response to stripe rust in wheat lines carrying the H. villosa chromosomes 2V, 3V and 4V are discussed. Key words: Haynaldia villosa, Puccinia striformis, Aceria tosichella, stripe rust, expression of resistance, addition lines, substitution lines, 6VS-translocation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→French-language works237,207→