MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013034912 · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/41/5/055102

Observation of vacancy defects at silicon grain boundaries formed via suppressed solid phase epitaxy

2008· article· en· W2013034912 on OpenAlexafffund
K.J. Dudeck, W. D. Walters, Andrew P. Knights, P. G. Coleman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsVacancy defectEpitaxyMaterials scienceSiliconGrain boundaryPhase (matter)CrystallographyOptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyMetallurgyMicrostructureChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polycrystalline silicon has been formed via the complete amorphization and subsequent thermal re-crystallization of the overlayer of silicon-on-insulator substrates. The formation of the polycrystalline phase was confirmed via cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy, with the samples also being characterized by variable energy positron annihilation spectroscopy (VEPAS). By comparing the response of the VEPAS spectra for samples in which polycrystal formation was confirmed with samples in which the silicon overlayer was regrown as a single crystal, it was possible to observe the existence of vacancy-type defects at the film grain boundaries. For a sample with an overlayer of 1500 nm thickness a saturation of the measured Doppler-broadened S-parameter of 1.025 was estimated for the polycrystalline sample. This leads us to conclude that the majority of the vacancy defects at the grain boundaries are close in structure to that of the silicon monovacancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207