Some antenna applications of negative-refractive-index transmission-line (NRI-TL) metamaterials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metamaterials are artificial structures engineered to exhibit unusual electromagnetic properties. Metamaterials (MTM) that exhibit a simultaneously negative electric permittivity epsi and magnetic permeability mu, and thus a negative refractive index (NRI), have recently attracted considerable attention in the electromagnetic community. This has been motivated by the potential to create new microwave and antenna devices that exhibit superior characteristics compared to their conventional counterparts. A useful method for implementing planar metamaterials is based on reactively loaded transmission lines (TL). Such NRI-TE media consist of a network of printed transmission lines, periodically loaded with lumped-element series capacitors (C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">o</sub> ) and shunt inductors (L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">o</sub> ) in a dual-TL (high-pass) configuration. The planar nature of the TL-based metamaterial (MTM) structures renders them well suited for the realization of planar microwave antennas and circuits. This paper discusses some antenna applications of NRI-TL metamaterials
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it