The Unique Solution Structure and Immunochemistry of theCandida albicans β-1,2-Mannopyranan Cell Wall Antigens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic oligomers of the antigenic Candida albicans (1-->2)-beta-mannopyranans adopt a compact solution conformation that leads to numerous inter-residue nuclear Overhauser effects, including unprecedented nuclear Overhauser effects between n and n + 3 residues. In excellent agreement with experimentally determined distances, unrestrained molecular dynamics point to a single family of conformations that approximate a compact helical motif with a three-residue repeat for this unique homopolymer. When the synthetic di- to hexasaccharides were employed as inhibitors of monoclonal antibodies, which protect mice against a lethal dose of the yeast pathogen, a novel pattern of inhibitor activity was observed. Instead of the paradigm first reported by Kabat (Kabat, E. A. (1962) Fed. Proc. 21, 694-701; Kabat, E. A. (1966) J. Immunol. 97, 1-11), wherein homo-oligosaccharides exhibit increasing inhibitory activity with increasing size, here the maximum activity is reached for di- and trisaccharides and diminishes significantly for tetra-, penta-, and hexasaccharides. These immunochemical data correlate with the ordered conformation of the beta-1,2-linked mannopyranan and imply that a uniquely small antigenic determinant has potential as a component of synthetic conjugate vaccines against Candida albicans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".