MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013064011 · doi:10.1177/1470412913509460

McLuhan’s World, Or, <i>Understanding Media</i> in Japan

2014· article· de· W2013064011 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Steinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visual Culture · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedia theorySociologyMedia studiesArtVisual artsAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marshall McLuhan was a divisive figure.To some he was a revolutionary media theorist and thinker, who literally put media theory on the map.To others he was a mere prophet (or profiteer) of the new media age, a public figure who lectured to private corporations, and was a hot topic in Madison avenue circles whose aphoristic style blended well with advertising copy.In Japan McLuhan was a divided figure.Before he was translated he was introduced, and this introduction was performed by two different people in two markedly different ways.In lieu of discussing my own encounter with McLuhan's Understanding Media, I'd like to use this space to ask us to think of a different space of reception: late 1960s Japan.Here interest in McLuhan had a fireworks--like intensity matched by an accompanying brevity.There would be McLuhan revivalsaround his death in the early 1980s, and from the late 1990s into the 2000s, as his work was repurposed for a new media era.But what is fascinating about reception of McLuhan in Japan -in addition to its impact on media theorization thereafter, and its important place in the still--to--be--written story of McLuhan's global reception -is the way that the divisive figure of McLuhan is literally mapped onto two very different writers, who introduce two very different McLuhans.The McLuhan boom in Japan was brief, but intense.It began in late 1966, and had all but died out by mid--1968 barely lasting long enough to see the translation of Understanding Media, which appeared in November 1967.Far more popular than the translation was the 1967 McLuhan's World (Makurūhan no sekai), a work of applied McLuhanism by a man who did the most to shape the reception of the figure in Japan: Takemura Ken'ichi.Takemura is known as the preeminent McLuhanist in Japan, and his 1967 McLuhan's World sold ten times more copies than the eventually translated Understanding Media, and made it up to #8 on the bestseller list of 1967.McLuhan's World was the Understanding Media for Japanese audiences.What marked Takemura's work was its appeal to general audiences, and perhaps even more significantly its presentation of McLuhan as the prophet of the electronic age, best read by business people, salaried workers, television industry heads and marketing executives.Takemura channeled a very specific McLuhan for Japanese readers: McLuhan the business visionary, McLuhan the adman, McLuhan the prophet of media industries and their transformations.And perhaps most importantly, a McLuhan localized forthe Japanese context, complete with references to Japanese popular culture, ads, and politics with predictions thrown in to boot.McLuhan's focus on television as tactile medium meshed with then current journalistic discussions about TV kids as the so-called "skin tribe"; television was presented as a "happening" medium, a conception that influenced both TV producers and advertising directors; Toyota and Honda

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visual CultureSame topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207