The relationship between rumen acidosis resistance and expression of genes involved in regulation of intracellular pH and butyrate metabolism of ruminal epithelial cells in steers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Past research has focused on the prevention and management of subacute rumen acidosis by manipulating the ration; however, the severity of acidosis varies even among animals fed a common high-grain diet. The objectives of this study were to compare the ruminal volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile and expression of genes involved in the metabolism of butyrate, the VFA most extensively metabolized by the ruminal epithelium, and intracellular pH regulation in ruminal epithelial cells between acidosis-resistant (AR) and acidosis-susceptible (AS) steers. Acidosis indexes (area per day under pH 5.8 divided by dry matter intake) were measured for 17 steers fed a common high-grain diet, and the 3 steers with the lowest (1.4 ± 1.2 pH∙min/kg) and the 3 with the highest values (23.9 ± 7.4 pH∙min/kg) were classified as AR and AS, respectively, and used in the subsequent study. The steers were force-fed a diet containing 85% grain at 60% of the expected daily intake (5.8 ± 0.8 and 5.6 ± 0.6 kg for AR and AS, respectively) within 30 min. Mean ruminal pH over the postprandial 6-h period was higher for AR compared with AS (6.02 vs. 5.55), and mean total VFA concentration was 74% for AR compared with AS (122 vs. 164 mM). Molar proportion of butyrate in the ruminal fluid was 139% higher for AR compared with AS (17.5 vs. 7.33 mol/100 mol of VFA). Expression of monocarboxylate cotransporter isoform 1, sodium hydrogen exchanger isoforms 1 and 2, and anion exchangers (downregulated in adenoma and putative anion exchanger, isoform 1) did not differ between AR and AS steers. However, expression of sodium hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, which imports Na(+) to the epithelial cell and exports H(+) to the rumen, was 176% higher in AR steers than in AS steers. Higher ruminal pH for AR might be partly due to a faster rate of VFA absorption, lower VFA production, or both.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".