Nuevos retos y oportunidades en un mundo globalizado: análisis político de la respuesta al VIH/Sida en México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo, síntesis de una investigación más amplia sobre la economía política del VIH/Sida en México, analiza la distinción entre globalismo neo-liberal (agenda ideológica y mayormente económica) y globalización (fenómeno mundial y multidimensional). Sostiene que la existencia de alternativas al paradigma neo-liberal es resultado de circunstancias político-económicas y sociales concretas de la realidad mexicana en el contexto de la globalización que han originado la formulación de políticas públicas relativamente más incluyentes. Se enfatiza en el contraste entre redes de políticas públicas excluyentes, como las que han caracterizado el proceso de reformas económicas estructurales o la re-estructuración del financiamiento de los sistemas de salud, y redes de políticas públicas con trabajo en VIH/Sida que se caracterizan por ser más incluyentes y democráticas. Como se discutirá, ambos tipos de redes funcionan tanto en México como en el ámbito global.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".