MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013114583 · doi:10.1115/2000-gt-0347

Advanced Oil Debris Monitoring for Pipeline Mechanical Drive Gas Turbines

2000· article· en· W2013114583 on OpenAlexaff
Duka Kitaljevich, Gerrit J. van Veldhuizen

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLubricants and Their Additives
Canadian institutionsGastops (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)PropulsionLubricationAutomotive engineeringTurbomachineryPipeline (software)TurbineComponent (thermodynamics)Condition monitoringRotor (electric)Gas compressorPipeline transportEngineeringMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceReliability engineeringComputer scienceAerospace engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas turbines are a critical component of many pipeline operations. Gas turbine component failures are very costly both in terms of unit down time as well as repair. These costs are significantly amplified in situations where the outage is unplanned and component failure causes secondary damage. This statement is particularly relevant for rotor bearing failures, which can rapidly lead to heavy damage to the turbomachinery components if not detected in time. This paper describes a new advanced technology online device, which is designed to monitor the lubrication oil system of the engine and detect the presence of metallic debris in real time. These particles are present in the oil only when there is damage occurring in the engine bearings or gear train. This monitor has recently been applied to engines in the pipeline, power generation, marine propulsion and aviation industries worldwide and has been proven to provide early warning of bearing failure allowing for repair during scheduled outages and before causing expensive secondary damage to the engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle InnovationsSame topicLubricants and Their AdditivesFrench-language works237,207