MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013119597 · doi:10.1109/mmsp.2011.6093813

Optimal resource allocation for multimedia cloud based on queuing model

2011· article· en· W2013119597 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Data Security Solutions
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceProvisioningResource allocationQueueing theoryQuality of serviceMultimediaResource (disambiguation)Service (business)Distributed computingResource management (computing)Response timeComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimedia cloud, as a specific cloud paradigm, addresses how cloud can effectively process multimedia services and provide QoS provisioning for multimedia applications. There are two major challenges in multimedia cloud. The first challenge is the service response time in multimedia cloud, and the second challenge is the cost of cloud resources. In this paper, we optimize resource allocation for multimedia cloud based on queuing model. Specifically, we optimize the resource allocation in both single-class service case and multiple-class service case. In each case, we formulate and solve the response time minimization problem and resource cost minimization problem, respectively. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed optimal allocation scheme can optimally utilize the cloud resources to achieve a minimal mean response time or a minimal resource cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Data Security SolutionsFrench-language works237,207