Making the invisible visible: using UAS-based high-resolution color-infrared imagery to identify buried medieval monastery walls
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Remote sensing techniques have become an increasingly important tool for surveying archaeological sites. However, budgeting issues in archaeological research often limit the application of satellite or airborne imagery. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) provide a flexible, quick, and more economical alternative to commonly used remote sensing techniques. In this study, the buried features of the archaeological site of the Kleinburlo monastery, near Münster, Germany, were identified using high-resolution color–infrared (CIR) images collected from a UAS platform. Based on these CIR images, a modified normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI blue ) was calculated, showing reflectance spectra of vegetation anomalies caused by water stress. In the presented study, the vegetation growing on top of the buried walls was better nourished than the surrounding plants because very wet conditions over the days previous to data collection caused higher levels of water stress in the surrounding water-drenched land. This difference in water stress was a good indicator for detecting archaeological remains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it