MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013140194 · doi:10.1109/cnsm.2010.5691280

Distortion optimization in enriched video traces for End-to-End video quality enhancement

2010· article· en· W2013140194 on OpenAlexaff
Araz Jahaniaval, D. Fayek, R.L. Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRate–distortion optimizationDistortion (music)Lossy compressionVideo qualityReal-time computingQuality of serviceWirelessData compressionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionVideo processingAlgorithmComputer networkMultiview Video CodingArtificial intelligenceVideo trackingTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Metric (unit)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video compression and streaming over lossy wireless networks is the current trend in telecommunication and encouraged by major carriers to increase their services portfolio. However, the technological challenges are still tackled to enable the delivery of high quality video. In our previous work, we developed a per stream distortion model that is based on the extended Gilbert model. We expanded our definition of the verbose video trace file with embedded coefficients derived from our distortion model. These coefficients are video quality descriptors that we associate with Quality of Service parameters that are measured in real-simulation time. In this work, we devise an optimization algorithm that is based on the distortion model to enhance the received video quality in End-to-End (E2E) communications. Our optimization algorithm is tested in multiple simulations to verify its validity. We report the results from our simulations that indicate significant improvements when this optimization algorithm is deployed in Edge Routers in conjunction with our video stream distortion coefficients and network metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207