Postnatal Changes in the Inactivation Properties of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Contribute to the Mature Firing Pattern of Spinal Motoneurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most mammals are born with the necessary spinal circuitry to produce a locomotor-like pattern of neural activity. However, rodents seldom demonstrate weight-supported locomotor behavior until the second or third postnatal week, possibly due to the inability of the neuromuscular system to produce sufficient force during this early postnatal period. As spinal motoneurons mature they are seen to fire an increasing number of action potentials at an increasing rate, which is a necessary component of greater force production. The mechanisms responsible for this enhanced ability of motoneurons are not completely defined. In the present study we assessed the biophysical properties of the developing voltage-gated sodium current to determine their role in the maturing firing pattern. Using dissociated postnatal lumbar motoneurons in short-term culture (18-24 h) we demonstrate that currents recorded from the most mature postnatal age group (P10-P12) were significantly better able to maintain channels in an available state during repetitive stimulation than were the younger age groups (P1-P3, P4-P6, P7-P9). This ability correlated with the ability of channels to recover more quickly and more completely from an inactivated state. These age-related differences were seen in the absence of changes in the voltage dependence of channel gating. Differences in both closed-state inactivation and slow inactivation were also noted between the age groups. The results indicate that changes in the inactivation properties of voltage-gated sodium channels are important for the development of a mature firing pattern in spinal motoneurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".