Don't bother to wrap it: Online Giftgiver and Bugchaser newsgroups, the social impact of gift exchanges and the ‘carnivalesque’
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At online internet newsgroups, members who self-identify as Giftgivers and Bugchasers post messages describing exchanging HIV as a gift, as the Gift. Using the literature on the social function of gift exchanges, this paper considers how Giftgiver and Bugchaser messages mobilize the language of gifts. In doing so, newsgroup members generate an ontological narrative wherein HIV, as the Gift, promotes social bonds, the creation and maintenance of self identity and social roles, and the meeting of particular goals. Thus the Gift appears to fulfill (at least discursively) many of the social functions of gift exchanges as described in the literature. Online newsgroups function as fora for the expression of a contrarian, transgressive HIV/AIDS narrative and act as 'carnivalesque' spaces in which normative social roles and meaning are inverted in the establishment of a realm whereby HIV becomes a gift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".