MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013226091 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/46/008

The electronic structure of KTaO<sub>3</sub>: a combined x-ray spectroscopic investigation

2004· article· en· W2013226091 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Kuepper, A. V. Postnikov, A. Moewes, Bernhard Schneider, M. Matteucci, H. Hesse, M. Neumann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryCanada Research ChairsDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMaterials scienceX-rayCrystallographyElectronic structureCondensed matter physicsOpticsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of potassium tantalate (KTaO3) is studied by various spectroscopic techniques, namely x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), x-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), and x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The experiments are compared with theoretical band structure calculations. Excellent agreement between theory and experiment is achieved. XPS and XES reveal that the valence band is dominated by strongly hybridized Ta 5d and O 2p states. Furthermore, we find that the Ta NIII resonant inelastic x-ray spectroscopy (RIXS) spectra consist of three distinct features. For excitation energies close to the Ta 4p absorption threshold an elastic recombination peak and a resonant Raman-like loss feature are present in addition to nonresonant-like x-ray emission. In comparison with band structure calculations we are able to assign the loss feature to charge transfer excitations between occupied Ta 5d and O 2p states and unoccupied Ta 5d states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207