MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013238704 · doi:10.1002/marc.200700226

Piezoelectric Ink‐Jet Printing of Horseradish Peroxidase: Effect of Ink Viscosity Modifiers on Activity

2007· article· en· W2013238704 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorseradish peroxidaseViscosityCarboxymethyl celluloseChemistryChemical engineeringPiezoelectricityMaterials sciencePolymerPulmonary surfactantPolymer chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study a bioink containing the horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme was formulated and jetted with a piezoelectric‐based ink‐jet deposition system. A number of polymers with different molecular weights, functional groups and electric charge were tested as viscosity modifiers. The impact of viscosity modifiers on HRP activity was systematically studied. It was found that viscosity modifiers typically used in commercial ink formulations significantly impaired HRP activity possibly due to limitations in diffusion. In contrast, carboxymethyl cellulose increased viscosity to the desired range for piezoelectric jetting without negatively affecting the HRP activity. Good jettability was obtained for the HRP bioink by adding a suitable surfactant, a viscosity modifier and a humectant. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it