MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013270458 · doi:10.1021/jf049320i

Antioxidant Activity of Commercial Soft and Hard Wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>L.) as Affected by Gastric pH Conditions

2005· article· en· W2013270458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntioxidantTroloxChemistryFood scienceDistilled waterDigestion (alchemy)In vivoBiochemistryGastrointestinal tractChromatographyDPPHBiologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phenolic compounds from soft and hard wheat and their milling fractions were extracted into distilled deionized water, and their in vitro antioxidant activities were evaluated. Wheat samples were used as such (nontreated) or subjected to pH adjustment (treated) in order to simulate gastrointestinal pH conditions. The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu's procedure. The total antioxidant activity (TAA) was determined using Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay and expressed as Trolox equivalents. The antioxidant activity of wheat extracts was also evaluated using the beta-carotene bleaching assay, scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical, and inhibition of oxidation of human low density lipoprotein cholesterol. The TPC, TAA, and antioxidant potential, evaluated using different methods of wheat samples, were significantly increased following gastrointestinal tract-simulated pH changes. Thus, digestion taking place in the gastrointestinal tract in vivo may also enhance the antioxidant properties of the extracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it