MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013274253 · doi:10.1109/tii.2007.911895

T-S Fuzzy-Model-Based Robust $H_{\infty}$ Design for Networked Control Systems With Uncertainties

2007· article· en· W2013274253 on OpenAlexaff
Huaguang Zhang, Jun Yang, Chun‐Yi Su

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Control theory (sociology)Robust controlSet (abstract data type)Network packetDropout (neural networks)Fuzzy control systemFuzzy logicController (irrigation)Computer scienceControl systemMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer networkMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns a problem of robust Hinfincontrol for a class of uncertain nonlinear networked control systems (NCSs), which can be represented by a T-S fuzzy model with uncertainties. Both network-induced delay and packet dropout are addressed. The controller design method is presented based on a delay-dependent approach, and the robust Hinfincontroller gain matrices are obtain by solving a set of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Moreover, a general Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional is used, and some slack matrices, which bring much flexibility in solving LMIs, are introduced during the proof. Simulation results show the validity of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations254
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207