MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013303566 · doi:10.1109/ised.2012.81

Recent Developments on Mapping Reversible Circuits to Quantum Gate Libraries

2012· article· en· W2013303566 on OpenAlexaff
D. Michael Miller, Zahra Sasanian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToffoli gateQuantum circuitQuantum gateElectronic circuitBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceLogic gateQuantumControlled NOT gateQuantum computerPolarity (international relations)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmComputer engineeringQuantum error correctionPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews recent developments on mapping reversible circuits to libraries of elementary quantum gates. The emphasis is on optimization of both the initial reversible circuit and the resulting quantum circuit. At the quantum level, improved realizations of single mixed-polarity multiple-control Toffoli gates are presented as well as techniques for performing quantum gate optimizations across Toffoli gate boundaries. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the methods presented using circuits from the REVLIB benchmark suite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207