Self-assembled Gd silicide nanostructures grown on Si(001)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growth of self-assembled gadolinium silicide nanostructures on Si(001) was studied over a range of metal coverages and growth temperatures. Scanned probe microscopy was used to study the nanostructure morphology. The analyses of cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy images, plan view transmission electron microscopy moiré fringe patterns, and nanobeam electron diffraction patterns show that the Gd silicide nanostructures fall into two classes: elongated nanowires with hexagonal crystal structure and rectangular islands with orthorhombic (or tetragonal) crystal structure. These results indicate that the nanostructure morphology is controlled by the magnitude and direction of the lattice mismatch with respect to the substrate. Optimum growth conditions for preferential growth of either nanowires or islands are described. In addition, the phase transformation from hexagonal to the more stable orthorhombic (or tetragonal) phase is observed and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it