MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013395784 · doi:10.1063/1.1513214

Control over exciton confinement versus separation in composite films of polyfluorene and CdSe nanocrystals

2002· article· en· W2013395784 on OpenAlexaff
Yu‐Chih Tseng, Marian Tzolov, Edward H. Sargent, P.W. Cyr, Margaret A. Hines

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyfluoreneNanocrystalMaterials scienceCadmium selenideExcitonTrioctylphosphine oxidePolymerQuantum dotComposite numberAbsorption (acoustics)OptoelectronicsPhotochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyChemistryConjugated systemCondensed matter physicsComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite films of polyfluorene derivative poly(9,9-di-(2-ethylhexyl)-fluorenyl-2,7-diyl) and cadmium selenide nanocrystals were investigated using photomodulation spectroscopy exciting only the nanocrystal phase. Efficient charge separation resulting in hole injection into the polymer was observed in films in which the nanocrystals had been stripped of surface trioctylphosphine oxide passivating groups. The resulting induced absorption band centered at 1.2 eV was assigned to bipolarons or π-dimers formed on the polymer in the near vicinity of the polymer/nanocrystal interface. The intensity dependence of this band suggests bimolecular recombination, supporting the interpretation of the band as due to charge separation. The measured wide distribution of lifetimes for the photogenerated states confirms the glassy nature of the polymer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207