MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013425440 · doi:10.2118/168982-ms

Immediate Gas Production from Shale Gas Wells: A Two-Phase Flowback Model

2014· article· en· W2013425440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Unconventional Resources Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringShale gasTight gasOil shaleHydraulic fracturingFracture (geology)Natural gasGeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)CompressibilityReservoir simulationReservoir engineeringRelative permeabilityMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringChemistryPetroleumPorosityEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although existing models for analysing single-phase flowback water production at the onset of flowback in tight oil and gas reservoirs provide estimates of fracture volume, they are not applicable to shale gas reservoirs. This is because flowback data from shale gas wells do not show this single phase region. Instead, they show a surprising trend of immediate gas breakthrough. This paper attempts to (1) understand the fundamental reasons for this early gas breakthrough, (2) develop a representative mathematical model that describes this behaviour and (3) estimate the effective fracture volume and equivalent fracture half-length by history matching the early-time two-phase flowback data. From the diagnostic plots generated from of rate/pressure data of 8 multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in the Muskwa Formation, the gas-water ratio (GWR) plots indicate the presence of initial free gas in the complex fracture network. This conclusion is backed by the imbibition experiments conducted on shale samples collected from the same formation showing the presence of gas-saturated natural fractures. The linear diffusivity equation is solved for early-time two-phase gas/water flow in the hydraulic fractures. The primary drive mechanism at the onset of flowback is initial free gas expansion within the fracture network. Secondary drive mechanisms considered include fracture water expansion and fracture closure. The driving forces are modeled by an effective compressibility term analogous to the total compressibility in conventional multiphase flow formulations. Also, two-phase water/gas flow is handled by an explicitly determined relative permeability function of time. Eventually a new pseudo-time function is defined to account for the changes in gas properties and relative permeability with time. Rate normalized pseudo-pressure versus pseudo-time plots give a straight line when applied to field data, thus the solution can be used to characterize hydraulic fractures in a manner similar to conventional well testing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it