MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamics of aggregate stability and biological binding agents during decomposition of organic materials

2006· article· en· W2013432568 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Abiven, Safya Menasseri, Denis A. Angers, Philippe Leterme

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMineralization (soil science)StrawWettingLoamCompostDecompositionOrganic matterEnvironmental chemistryAgronomyChemical engineeringSoil waterSoil scienceNitrogenOrganic chemistryInorganic chemistryEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The relative importance of different binding mechanisms and associated biological binding agents on aggregate stability is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of various aggregate binding agents during the decomposition of cauliflower residues, wheat straw, cattle manure and poultry woody compost. We measured aggregate stability, hot‐water extractable polysaccharide, C mineralization, fungal and microbial biomass dynamics in an amended silt loam soil, under controlled conditions. Soil aggregate stability was measured using three methods involving fast wetting, slow wetting and mechanical breakdown. Aggregate stability to slow wetting followed the same dynamics as C mineralization and was well correlated with polysaccharide content for cauliflower residues and wheat straw. This relationship is in agreement with the hypothesis that the rapid microbially induced improvement in aggregate stability that follows fresh organic residue additions at least partly involves labile polysaccharides. The transient increase in the two other types of stability was not directly related to C mineralization dynamics and seemed to be influenced by fungal hyphal length. Fungi would provide resistance to mechanical breakdown and slaking. The dynamic behaviour of biological binding agents was only partly explained by the initial quality of the organic materials, as characterized by Van Soest proximal fractionation. Dynamique de la stabilité structurale et des facteurs agrégeants biologiques associée à la décomposition de produits organiques. Résumé L’importance relative des différents mécanismes d’agrégation et des facteurs agrégeants biologiques associés n’est toujours pas clairement établie. L’objectif de cette étude est d’évaluer l’effet de différents facteurs agrégeants sur la stabilité structurale au cours de la décomposition de produits organiques: de résidus de chou‐fleur, de paille de blé, d’un fumier de bovin et d’un compost de fientes de volailles et d’écorce de peuplier. Nous avons mesuré les dynamiques de stabilité des agrégats, de minéralisation du C et des biomasses microbienne et fongique d’un sol limoneux amendé pour des conditions contrôlées. La stabilité structurale est mesurée par trois traitements d’intensités différentes correspondant à une humectation rapide, une humectation lente et une désagrégation mécanique sur des agrégats. La stabilité structurale soumise à l’humectation lente suit les mêmes dynamiques que la minéralisation du C et est bien corrélée avec la concentration en polysaccharides pour les résidus de chou‐fleur et la paille de blé. Cette corrélation confirme l’hypothèse que les polysaccharides labiles participent au moins partiellement à l’amélioration rapide de la stabilité des agrégats induite par l’activité microbienne à la suite d’apports de produits organiques frais. L’augmentation transitoire des deux autres types de stabilité structurale n’est pas directement liée aux dynamiques de minéralisation du C et est plutôt influencée par la longueur des hyphes mycéliens. Le rôle des champignons serait alors d’accroître la résistance des agrégats soumis à des forces de désagrégation plus importantes. Le comportement des différents agents agrégeants biologiques n’est que partiellement expliqué par la composition initiale des produits organiques, caractérisés par la méthode de fractionnement Van Soest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations185
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesFrench-language works237,207