MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2013531221 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.016007

Renormalization-scale invariance, minimal sensitivity, and the inclusive hadronic decays of a 115 GeV Higgs particle

2001· article· en· W2013531221 on OpenAlexaff
Farrukh Chishtie, V. Elias

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHiggs bosonParticle physicsPhysicsRenormalizationScale invarianceHadronSensitivity (control systems)Scale (ratio)Renormalization groupParticle (ecology)Nuclear physicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Known perturbative expressions for the decay rates of 115 GeV Higgs particle into either two gluons or a $b\overline{b}$ pair are shown to exhibit renormalization-scale $(\ensuremath{\mu})$ dependence that is largely removed via renormalization-group or Pad\'e-approximant estimates of these rates' next order contributions. The extrema in \ensuremath{\mu} characterizing both rates, as determined from fully known orders of perturbation theory, are very nearly equal to corresponding \ensuremath{\mu}-insensitive rates obtained via estimation of their next order contributions, consistent with ``minimal-sensitivity'' expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→