MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Carbon K-edge polarimetry with Cr/Sc multilayers

2013· article· en· W2013537845 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarimeterOpticsPolarimetryPolarization (electrochemistry)UndulatorMaterials scienceK-edgeBeam (structure)PhysicsScatteringChemistryAbsorption spectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the polarization changes simultaneously occurring with intensity changes due to carbon contamination of optical components at two plane grating beam lines PGM 1 and PGM 2 at BESSY II. The two beam lines are very similar to each other and connect to the same APPLE II type undulator UE56 2. The spectra measured with initial horizontal and vertical polarization differ for the two beam lines. For polarimetry measurements the BESSY 8 axis polarimeter is equipped with a Cr Sc multilayer in transmission as phase retarder and a Cr Sc reflecting multilayer operating near the Brewster angle as analyzer. The polarimetry results also differ for the two beam lines. Only at PGM 2 we observe no decline of the degree of polarization within experimental errors i.e. the degree of polarization at PGM 2 is always found P gt; 0.96. We find big changes of the polarization which rapidly vary across the carbon edge. A tentative interpretation predicts the orientation of the dipoles in the contaminating carbon layers. Circular polarization is largely recovered 80 and higher at PGM 2 thru out the carbon edge by setting the undulator shift to approximately compensate the polarizing properties of the beam line

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it