MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013564065 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201001771

Synthesis and Characterization of New Thieno[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione Derivatives for Photovoltaic Applications

2010· article· en· W2013564065 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed Najari, Serge Beaupré, Philippe Berrouard, Yingping Zou, Jean‐Rémi Pouliot, Charlotte Lepage‐Pérusse, Mario Leclerc

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSustainable Development Technology CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsThiopheneMaterials scienceCopolymerPyrroleConjugated systemAlkylSide chainBand gapPolymer chemistryPolymerCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new class of low‐bandgap copolymers based on benzodithiophene (BDT) and thieno[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione (TPD) units is reported. Chemical modifications of the conjugated backbone promote both high molecular weights and processability while allowing for tuning of the electronic properties. Copolymers with substituted thiophene spacers (alkyl chains facing the BDT unit) or unsubstituted thiophene spacers tend to have low power conversion efficiencies (PCE less than 1%) due to a bad morphology of the active layer, whereas copolymers with substituted thiophene spacers (alkyl chains facing TPD unit) show enhanced morphology and PCEs up to of 3.9%. Finally, BDT‐TPD copolymers without any thiophene spacers still show the best performances with power conversion efficiencies up to 5.2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations179
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207