MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013588226 · doi:10.1002/ch.375

CBT and hypnosis: the worry‐bug versus the cake

2009· article· en· W2013588226 on OpenAlexaff
Leora Kuttner

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Hypnosis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPain Management and Placebo Effect
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypnosisWorryPsychologyPsychotherapistClinical psychologyAlternative medicineMedicinePsychiatryAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sleep and pain negatively impact each other. Children in pain often have difficulty going to sleep and sustaining sleep. Anxiety often develops within this negative cycle. Hypnotherapy has been noted as an effective intervention for pain, sleep and anxiety. The case presented illustrates the use of hypnotherapy in contrast to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to resolve an 11‐year‐old girl's cycle of persistent anxiety, abdominal pain and sleep interruption. Utilizing the child's favourite activity of baking a cake, a metaphor for successful sleep was developed. The hypnotherapeutic use of surprise and dissonance promoted a rapid resolution of this pre‐teen's difficulties. An explication of this process is provided. Copyright © 2009 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary HypnosisSame topicPain Management and Placebo EffectFrench-language works237,207