MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013594289 · doi:10.1177/0091270009347673

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of a Once‐Daily Tramadol Extended‐Release Tablet and an Immediate‐Release Reference Product Following Single‐Dose and Multiple‐Dose Administration

2010· article· en· W2013594289 on OpenAlexaff
David Karhu, Caroline Fradette, Maria Potgieter, Maria Manuela Frederico Ferreira, J. Terblanchè

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Canadian institutionsMicropharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTramadolPharmacokineticsBioequivalenceMedicineDosingAnesthesiaAnalgesicPharmacologyPlasma concentration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pharmacokinetics of a once-daily formulation of tramadol (Tramadol Contramid OAD 200-mg tablets) following single-dose and multiple-dose administration was compared with that of an immediate-release product (tramadol IR 50-mg tablets) in 2 separate studies. In both studies, AUC parameters met bioequivalence criteria, whereas C(max) of Tramadol Contramid OAD was lower than that of tramadol IR following a 200-mg daily dosage. After single-dose administration, the mean tramadol concentration at 1 hour postdose was within the range associated with analgesic efficacy (>100 ng/mL), and the mean concentration remained above this level for the remainder of the dosing interval. Steady state was attained within 48 hours following multiple-dose administration. Tramadol Contramid OAD provides a rapid rise in plasma concentrations and an equivalent daily systemic exposure as tramadol IR, with a reduction in peak plasma concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaFrench-language works237,207