MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2013616370 · doi:10.5194/bgd-6-9195-2009

Modeling dissolved oxygen dynamics and coastal hypoxia: a review

2009· review· en· W2013616370 on OpenAlexaff
M. Angélica Peña, Sergei Katsev, Temel Oǧuz, Denis Gilbert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleHypoxia (environmental)Environmental scienceEcosystemNutrient cycleBiogeochemistryEcologyBiochemical engineeringOceanographyBiologyOxygenChemistryGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Hypoxia occurs in marine ecosystems throughout the world, influences biogeochemical cycles of elements and may have severe impacts on marine life. Hypoxia results from complex interactions between physical and biogeochemical processes, which can not be addressed by observations alone. In this paper, we review oxygen dynamical models that have been applied in studies of factors controlling coastal hypoxia and in predictions of future states. We also identify scientific issues that need further development and point out some of the major challenges. Over recent decades, substantial progress has been made in the development of oxygen dynamical models. Considerable progress has been made towards the parameterization of biogeochemical processes in the water column and sediments, such as the dynamic representation of nitrification-denitrification. Recent advances in three-dimensional coupled physical-ecological-biogeochemical models allow better representation of physical-biological interactions. Several types of modelling approaches, from simple to complex, have significantly contributed to improve our understanding of hypoxia. We discuss the applications of these models to the study of the effects of oxygen depletion on biogeochemical cycles, links between nutrient enrichment and hypoxia development, impacts of hypoxia on marine ecosystems and predictions of climate change responses. However, for some processes models are still crude. For example, current representations of organic matter transformations and remineralization are incomplete, as they are mostly based on empirical parameterizations at few locations. For most of these processes, the availability of validation data has been a limiting factor in model development. Another gap is that, in virtually all nutrient load models, efforts have focused on nutrient utilization and organic matter degradation, whereas three-dimensional mixing and advection have been less well represented. Explicit inclusion of physical and biogeochemical processes in models will help us answer several important questions, such as those about the causes of the observed worldwide increase in hypoxic conditions, and future changes in the intensity and spread of coastal hypoxia. At the same time, recent quantitative model intercomparison studies suggest that the predictive ability of our models may be adversely affected by their increasing complexity, unless the models are properly constrained by observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→