MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HUMAN BODY EXPOSURE TO POWER LINES: RELATION OF INDUCED QUANTITIES TO EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELDS

2002· article· en· W2013634656 on OpenAlexaff
M.A. Stuchly, Trevor W. Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDosimetryVoxelMagnetic fieldComputational physicsComputationPhysicsField (mathematics)Nuclear medicineComputer scienceMathematicsMedicineAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Induced electric field and corresponding current density values in various organs of the human body can be computed numerically using a heterogeneous, anatomically representative voxel model. Such computations are available for uniform magnetic fields of various directions with respect to the body. The highest exposure levels occur for non-uniform fields, most often in occupational settings. Various organ induced dosimetric measures of the induced quantities can also be computed, although the associated computational complexity and effort are greater than for uniform fields. A simplified method of estimation of the induced measures is described and validated. The method is based on evaluation of the external (exposure) magnetic flux density in locations corresponding to those occupied by various organs and dosimetry for the uniform fields. Computations of the external fields are relatively simple even for very complex geometries of current-carrying conductors. Computational methods are available for external fields. The external magnetic fields can also be measured. Detailed organ dosimetry is already published. In this contribution, the proposed simplified dosimetry is verified using accurate, numerically computed dosimetry for four non-uniform field exposure scenarios. For most dosimetric measures and organs, the proposed method gives conservative estimates. Only in rare cases when a large organ is in a weak exposure field compared to the whole-body average exposure, the induced dosimetric measures may be underestimated by up to 10%. Another exception is the maximum induced electric field in spatially distributed tissues such as bone marrow, muscle, or skin when a part of the limb is in a very strong magnetic field close to the conductor. However, both of these situations are easily recognizable from the mutual configuration of the human body and the current-carrying conductors. Thus, additional corrections can be applied to the estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth PhysicsSame topicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsFrench-language works237,207