Cardiac neuronal hierarchy in health and disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cardiac neuronal hierarchy can be represented as a redundant control system made up of spatially distributed cell stations comprising afferent, efferent, and interconnecting neurons. Its peripheral and central neurons are in constant communication with one another such that, for the most part, it behaves as a stochastic control system. Neurons distributed throughout this hierarchy interconnect via specific linkages such that each neuronal cell station is involved in temporally dependent cardio-cardiac reflexes that control overlapping, spatially organized cardiac regions. Its function depends primarily, but not exclusively, on inputs arising from afferent neurons transducing the cardiovascular milieu to directly or indirectly (via interconnecting neurons) modify cardiac motor neurons coordinating regional cardiac behavior. As the function of the whole is greater than that of its individual parts, stable cardiac control occurs most of the time in the absence of direct cause and effect. During altered cardiac status, its redundancy normally represents a stabilizing feature. However, in the presence of regional myocardial ischemia, components within the intrinsic cardiac nervous system undergo pathological change. That, along with any consequent remodeling of the cardiac neuronal hierarchy, alters its spatially and temporally organized reflexes such that populations of neurons, acting in isolation, may destabilize efferent neuronal control of regional cardiac electrical and/or mechanical events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it