Oral Sensorimotor Integration in Adults Who Stutter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between tendon vibration sensitivity and oral motor control in adults who stutter (AWS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten controls and 10 AWS first made jaw-opening movements from a closed-mouth position to an 18-mm target. Then, masseter tendon vibration was applied during jaw opening in a separate condition to test whether accuracy and/or variability is related to movement undershoot. RESULTS: AWS made less accurate and more variable jaw movements than controls without visual feedback. Among the normally fluent adult participants, higher accuracy and lower variability were significantly related to masseter vibration undershoot, but significant correlations were not observed for AWS. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that increased tendon vibration sensitivity may be related to more refined oral motor control. Subtle sensorimotor limitations could be present in stuttering that render speech more susceptible to breakdowns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it