MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2013654156 · doi:10.1115/fuelcell2011-54364

Modeling the Effective Thermal Conductivity of an Anisotropic Gas Diffusion Layer in a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell

2011· article· en· W2013654156 on OpenAlexaff
J. Yablecki, Aimy Bazylak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermal conductivityPorosityElectrolyteComposite materialProton exchange membrane fuel cellMicroscale chemistryAnisotropyConductivityPolymerMembraneChemistryElectrodeOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The anisotropic and heterogeneous effective thermal conductivity of the gas diffusion layer (GDL) of the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell was determined in the through-plane direction using an analytical thermal resistance model. The geometry of the GDL was reconstructed using porosity profiles obtained through microscale computed tomography imaging of four commercially available GDL materials. The effective thermal conductivity increases almost linearly with increasing bipolar plate compaction pressure. The effective thermal conductivity was also seen to increase with increasing GDL thickness as bulk porosity remained almost constant. The effect of the heterogeneous through-plane porosity distribution on the effective thermal conductivity is discussed. The outcomes of this work will provide insight into the effect of heterogeneity and anisotropy of the GDL on the thermal management required for improved PEMFC performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→